Following the publication
of a new tick list in the June 2013 issue of TRAIL magazine;
“THE 1000m
PEAKS OF THE BRITISH ISLES”
I wrote a blog about its
composition and some possible exclusions.
The list was linked to an
article of Mike Cawthorne’s walk over the 135 Scottish 1000 metre summits as
described in his book “Hell of a
Journey” I managed to separate Mike’s summits from TRAIL’s list, coming
to the conclusion that Mike’s list was specific (see my previous blog) and that
the TRAIL list has no specific link to it, other than a common “1000 metre”
criterion.
Of the 141 summits in TRAIL’s
list;
135 are Scottish
5 are Welsh
1 is Irish.
The Welsh summits
The 5 Welsh summits are
the four 1000 metre Furths as listed in Munro’s tables plus Glyder Fawr (itself
a Furth summit) whose height is listed as 999 metres in the tables but has been
resurveyed resulting in a new height given as 1001 metres.
The Irish summits
The exclusion of two Irish
summits gives rise to an inconsistency.
If the Welsh summits give any precedent, the list should include the
Irish Furth summits of at least 1000 metres.
These are Carrauntoohil, Beenkeragh and Caher. But only Carrauntoohil is included. Why?
Both Beenkeragh and Caher
have a significant drop so it’s not as if they are insignificant summits. There are quite a few Scottish summits in the
list with less!
I have a theory that
Carrauntoohil was included so that the list would be a “British Isles” list and
whoever compiled it didn’t think to include the other two Furth summits. Or maybe their research just wasn’t thorough
enough.
The Scottish summits
The Scottish summits that
make the list are the 1000 metre Munros as listed in the 1997 edition of Munros
tables – except for two! The two missing
peaks are the lower Munros of An Teallach (Sgurr Fiona) and Liathach (Mullach
an Rathain).
I’ve always found that
TRAIL doesn’t seem to recognise that An Teallach and Liathach, both magnificent
mountains in their own right, each contain two Munros. And I’ve always wondered why. Is it because they are both generally known
as a single entity in the eyes of many?
I can’t think of any other reason.
The complete list
TRAIL’s list was published
with no specific prominence criteria which means that it can be considered
complete. But it is inconsistent!
If I ever get around to
ticking the 1000 metre Peaks of the British Isles, my list will have 145
summits!
No comments:
Post a Comment